‘Question the victim’s version’, one of the four arguments for the defense of Dani Alves in the case of sexual assault

‘Question the victim’s version’, one of the four arguments for the defense of Dani Alves in the case of sexual assault

The Dani Alves case continues to be the center of attention. The Brazilian, who is in pretrial detention, relies on the appeal, filed this Monday at the Barcelona Court against the order of January 20 of the head of the Investigating Court number 15 of the Ciudad Condal.

Dani Alves’ confession in prison and the reasons why he could go free

This defense brief, which consists of 25 pages and is based on the request for the release of the soccer player, has had exclusive access to the Spanish channel antenna 3publish daily ACE from Spain.

Dani Alves did not use a condom and my client is receiving treatment for an infectious disease, says a lawyer

This document, which was presented by the attorney from Cristóbal Martell’s law firm, consists of four fundamental pillars that seek to “question the victim’s version” and summarize the reasons why his client must leave the Saints 2 prison.

“He started slapping me. I didn’t get to give him fellatio”, part of the crude story of the 23-year-old girl who accused Dani Alves of sexual assault

camera images

In the first place, this resource points directly to the recordings of the cameras of the Sutton nightclub, where it ensures that the images are contradictory in relation to the facts denounced by the alleged victim.

“The dispassionate vision of the images captured by the security cameras of the Sutton premises is enough to place in severe quarantine or value doubt some factual statements elevated to the category of proven fact,” it collects.

“The entry of the complainant, her cousin and her friend is noted and for 20 long minutes five people are observed conversing in a playful and festive way… which is far from being the context of “environmental intimidation”, he adds.

On the other hand, the way in which the young woman ended up at the scene is also questioned, where she reiterates that the young woman entered the bathroom without being asked by Alves.

“It is observed how Mr. Daniel Alves goes to the left and enters the bathroom door… 2 minutes later the complainant, after talking with her two friends and a waiter during that time, goes to that door and enters without Daniel Alves clearing the way for him or opening the door for him. The images speak for themselves,” she said.

Rationale for version change

Another of the points to highlight in this appeal is the justification for the change in his client’s version at the time of his first statement, where he assured that there was no sexual encounter with the alleged victim in order to hide said infidelity from Joana Sanz.

“An initial refusal finds a natural and rudimentary explanation in the will to preserve his wife and children from conduct that is perhaps inappropriate for a sexual relationship,” he explains.

Broken contracts and flight risk

The media exposure of this scandal, which has made headlines in the media, led Pumas de México, his club, to terminate his contract due to this serious accusation, as well as some sponsorship brands, advertising and images with which who had a contractual relationship.

“There are several companies and there will be more in the coming days and weeks that have terminated sponsorship, advertising and image contracts,” he said.

Alves’ defense takes shelter in breaking this agreement as the main element to prevent his flight outside our country. In fact, the appeal notably considers the provision of the soccer player to take a statement, even knowing that the media knew about said accusation. “It is obvious, going to the appeal is the opposite of fleeing.”

Also, it should be noted that the lawyers requested the use of a telematic bracelet, as well as the withdrawal of the passport and thus avoid the risk of flight. (D)

Source: Eluniverso

You may also like

Immediate Access Pro