The countries of the European Union are keeping the possibility of excluding Russia from the Swift payment system, key to economically isolating the country since determines the bank codes that are necessary to make or receive any international transfer.
The Society for World Interbank Financial Telecommunication, better known by its acronym Swift is a cooperative of financial companies, mainly banks, to which it provides services and directed since July 1, 2019 by the Spanish Javier Pérez-Tasso.
It was created in 1973, when it was established in Brussels with more than 200 entities; in 1976 it already had more than 500 members in more than fifteen countries, but it was still in its infancy and it was not until 1977 that the first messages began to be sent, BBVA recalls on its website.
Ten years later, it had 2,161 clients in 61 countries and had already sent more than 192 million messages, and today it has more than 9,000 members worldwide.
Joe Biden sanctions Russian banking and expels Russia’s second-highest diplomat in Washington
The main reason why Swift is often known for being an international code that provides its partners with an encrypted messaging service that enables international fund transfers.
Swift determines the bank codes, known as BICs, that are necessary to make or receive an international transfer, so it can become a very useful tool for Europe if it wants to isolate Russia economically.
The BIC code, acronym for Bank Identifier Code, also known directly as Swift, is used to identify the beneficiary bank of a transfer and is an international alphanumeric code that can consist of 8 or 11 characters.
The 8-character code includes information on the entity, each country and the locality. And that of 11, in addition to all of the above, includes the specific information of a branch.
When a client makes an international transfer in favor of another, the issuing bank generates an encrypted message, that BIC or Swift code, that indicates how the funds will be delivered to that client, with all kinds of details such as dates, currencies, expenses or through which entities.
It is proof of the irrevocable completion of an international transfer, and provides security and information to the recipient.
Expulsion Dangers
If the Russian financial entities will be left out of the Swift systemyour banking operations would be seriously complicated because they could not make international charges or payments with the rest of the entities that use this system.
For all purposes, there would be a blockade of bank transfers with the country, which in turn would have collateral effects, since any foreign company that needs to make payments in Russia would not have the option to do so in this way.
Alternatives for Russia?
OBS Business School professor and expert in digital strategy at Gartner, Martín Piqueras, also warns that Russia would try to find alternatives so that its banks can continue making international transfers if they are kicked out of Swift.
For example, point Russia could use the China International Payments System, known as CIPS, which went live in 2015 with 19 Chinese and foreign banks settling in mainland China. and 176 indirect participants covering 6 continents and 47 countries and regions.
This alternative offers its participants payments and international transfers in yuan.
Hence, the decision to expel Russia from the Swift system cannot be taken lightly and even if the EU countries finally request it, it will have to be the committee of this society that decides, since it is the one that has the right to expel or recruit your partners. In late 2018, Swift decided to suspend access to its system to several Iranian banks after the United States reinstated sanctions against Tehran. (I)
Source: Eluniverso
Paul is a talented author and journalist with a passion for entertainment and general news. He currently works as a writer at the 247 News Agency, where he has established herself as a respected voice in the industry.
