The surveys They gave him between one and three seats and the results have finally given him three. The party is over (SALF)the party that has presented itself to these European elections with the far-right agitator Alvise Pérez Topping the list, he has taken three of the 61 seats that Spain distributes in the European Parliament. With the 4.58% of the votesa figure very similar to that obtained by Sumar, Alvise Pérez will travel to Brussels along with the two candidates who follow him on the list, Diego Solier Fernández and Nora Junco García.

The polls also got it right Vox, who was predicted to double its results and that he has managed to win three MEPs, so in the European Chamber there will be a total nine far-right deputies from Spain. With 1.3 million voters five years ago, the green party, led by Jorge Buxadé, has added some 400,000 voters, giving it a total of six seats.

Although the polls in Spain closed at 8:00 p.m., to know the results of the elections in Spain (and in the rest of the EU countries) you have to wait until all the polling stations are closed. This happened at 11:00 p.m., when Italy has closed the vote, and at which time the results of many countries whose scrutiny had already practically ended have been published. The first results have been known with 99.59% of the vote counted.

SALF, agitator formation, located to the right of Voxhas managed to add nearly 800,000 ballots, after a campaign in which Pérez has defined himself as the “most censored person” in the country. The truth is that this is not the first time that the Sevillian, with thousands of followers on social networks, has been linked to politics: he went through UPyD and Ciudadano and became an advisor to Toni Cantó.

After learning the results, Alvise Pérez came out to celebrate the data of his match, ensuring that They are not “damn parasites” but people with “work, occupation and benefit”. “We are not parasites, like that partitocratic system that has been looting us all for 45 years, since the transition,” she noted.

In his speech, Pérez has criticized that they are considered “ultra-right” when, in his words, people like him limit themselves to “asking for freedom and security” in the streets, neighborhoods and country. “They will call us radicals, ultras and horrible things, but you know as well as I do that we are positive people, patriots and full of enthusiasm.”

The journalist Antonio Maestre has explained that SALF (The party is over) It is not a party that “can be analyzed with the frameworks of the extreme right”neither the classic nor the new, as it is a troll from Internet.

Alvise Pérez, involved in a multitude of legal cases

The new party that now enters the European Parliament is tremendously personalistic about his figure and it does not have a clear program beyond the populist discourse that has propelled it to Brussels. Now, Alvise is being pursued by numerous legal cases, mainly for publishing false information, hoaxes and even for disseminating images of the private lives of many people.

A little less than a year ago, last July, the Provincial Court of Madrid convicted the then only tweeter for violating the right to Ana Pastor’s own imageto the spread images of your private life without consent. On that occasion, the compensation amounted to 10,000 euros.

In March 2023, the far-right agitator sentenced to pay 5,000 euros to the former mayor of Madrid Manuela Carmena, against whom she published a series of messages on social networks where he claimed that he had received a personal respirator so as not to have to go to a public hospital “and stand in line like the rest of the Spaniards.” A few months before, at the beginning of the year, the Provincial Court of Madrid condemned for disseminating unverified information about Ana Pastor’s companyNewtral.

During the pandemic, the Catalan Socialist Party reported the far-right agitator to the Prosecutor’s Office, after he spread a false PCR on social networks, attributed to the then Minister of Health, Salvador Illa. laSexta was able to verify that the text did not correspond to any health document and that there was “no analysis with that name.”