Three months after ten years since its strange and painful disappearance, Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 is still shrouded in mystery.

The plane was no longer visible on radar when it flew from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing on March 8, 2014. Clarín indicates that the plane disappeared off the coast of South Australia.

There were 227 passengers and 12 crew members aboard the Boeing 777. Despite the search efforts, El Universal de México notes, “the exact location of the accident and the aircraft’s final destination remain unknown.” This is cause for analysis, discussions and disagreements.

“Scattered fragments” of the plane have been found, such as those found on Reunion Island, Africa.

Malaysia Airlines: an expert speaks

Peter Waring suggests that the crash site was actually somewhere else. This man, because of his experience in topography and seabed mapping, was “hired to help scan a search area 56 miles wide and 400 miles long.” The mapping focused on an area known as Broken Ridge, Clarín explained.

However, Waring believes they were confused while searching for MH370 at Broken Ridge. The expert said the plane could have fallen further south, in an area known as the Geelvinck Fracture Zone, where it would have flown undetected.

As a gesture of fairness, the fact that he opines: “A lot of wasted effort has been spent looking in the wrong areas” should be acknowledged.

“We took it very seriously during the search that the aircraft could have remained under control in some form after it passed the seventh arc.”

According to what was reported in Clarín, he does not share the idea that the Malaysia Airlines plane “made a U-turn in less than an hour before crashing into the area of ​​the Indian Ocean known as ‘seventh arc”.

New evidence indicates that flight MH370 may have turned south earlier than previously thought

Creepy theory about Malaysia Airlines

Saharie Ahmad Shah was the pilot of the missing plane and it is thought he may have carried out a “suicidal” maneuver.

Waring believes that “Shah wanted to conceal the plane in a controlled emergency landing so that the debris would be more than 50 miles southwest of the search area.”

Relying on the theories of pilot Simon Hardy, Waring believes the plane was “shot down” in a ditch half a mile deep and seven wide above Geelvinck.

What did they find from the plane?

A fisherman said he found part of the plane from Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 in South Australia, Infobae noted.

While sailing 50km off the southern coast of Australia, Kit Olver and his team found the wing of a commercial plane, El Universal explained.

The event, according to Infobae, occurred between September and October 2014, “when Olver, aged 77, was fishing in an area approximately 55 kilometers west of the town of Robe, South Australia.”

Olver was met with disbelief and his discovery was forgotten until Olver’s revelation to the Sydney Morning Herald, in which he suggested the remains could still be on the seabed off Australia,” Infobae published.

In September 2015, the French public prosecutor’s office said that the plane wing fragments found last July on the French island of Réunion were “with certainty” from Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, which disappeared in March 2014, El Universo reported.

France confirms that the remains found on Réunion Island are from flight MH370

The order they place in France

Jean-Luc Marchand, an aviation specialist; and former pilot Patrick Blelly have asked Les Echos to resume new investigations to try to locate the Boeing’s remains, according to media reports.

They “estimated that the remains of the device could be found ‘within a few days’. And that the remains of the shipwreck would be in an area that has not yet been explored.”

They do not rule out that the Boeing “was deliberately diverted from its route before it crashed into the sea.”

“We believe, and from the investigation we have shown, that the hijacking was probably carried out by an experienced pilot. The cabin was depressurized and the landing was controlled to minimize the spread of debris. This makes the research even more difficult,” says Jean-Luc Marchand.

(JO)