“I do not accept”: girlfriend reacted jokingly to decisive moment and judge postponed civil marriage by not approving game

There are notaries, mayors, prefects or civil judges who do not accept grooms without a tie or wearing a sweater at their wedding. Civil marriage deserves respect, they think. At these levels of demand, they allow a touch of jest in such a solemn act much less.

That is exactly what happened to a bride and groom whose civil wedding was postponed because one of the spouses made a joke at the decisive moment.

It is not clear whether the couple wanted to step on the grounds of the alleged humor for TikTok or another social network.

After 4 years of relationship, he discovers at the altar that his girlfriend has four children: the video shows the young woman’s plea to marry her

Girlfriend reacted jokingly and the judge postponed the civil wedding

Danilo and Miriam, from Mexico, are the protagonists of a particular moment recorded and broadcast on social networks.

The material, Univisión points out, was shared by the lawyer Fernando José Arias and can be seen when the bride wanted to play funny with her fiancé in court.

“If you stop loving her, don’t hurt her, bring her back to me”: the speech of a loving father to his son-in-law at his daughter’s wedding goes viral on the networks

Do you accept it?… “No”

Hand in hand, Danilo – well dressed and with a bow tie – was, as usual, the first to answer.

–Mr. Danilo, is it your free and spontaneous will to marry Miss Miriam?asked the judicial authority.

–Yessaid the friend without hesitation

–Miss Miriam, is it your free and spontaneous will to marry Mr. Danilo?It was her turn.

– Nohe replied and laughed.

The group of guests was amused by the reactions and laughed too. But who was not for jokes was the judge.

–Can’t, can’t joke

–oh excuse mesaid Miriam

–No, there is no excuse. Unfortunately we cannot perform the ceremony today.

The judge’s reaction shocked everyone, the couple and the guests. They couldn’t believe what they heard.

–You can talk to the secretary and schedule another dateinvited amid the bewilderment of the couple and their relatives.

Opinions

Why did the judge go so far?

Perhaps he thought there might be a defect in the contracting party’s consent and that the act should be stopped to investigate whether coercion (if coerced) was involved. The court has the power to annul the act and examine the reason why the contracting party declared “No”.

For some users, the judge exaggerated; Others agree with the decision because it is a solemn act and requires legal rigor.

“It’s good for me that he canceled so he learns that marriage is serious business,” said one man.

Richard Espinoza thinks he “ruined” everyone’s party with that reckless act.

One woman disagreed: “Maybe that’s (no joke) in the Civil Code or it’s a rule, but stopping a party that’s been planned for a long time is overkill.”

“The judge was not very tolerant,” said Juana Daza.

And there is no shortage of those who continue to take the anecdote with humor, telling Danilo: “Bro, get the signs”, “The one he was saved from”, “Friend, you have another chance, give yourself another breath” and “Realize it’s not there”.