One of the big challenges in the country is restoring the lost trust. There is no trust in institutions and their representatives who did things behind the backs of citizens and who generated uncertainty and hopelessness.

This requires the will of all, starting with the government, which does not think of its personal or group interests, but of the general welfare, which in turn can generate peace and security in an environment of violence, instability and uncertainty. .

This includes correcting the attitudes and decisions imposed on the legal system and the irrationalities of the authorities that govern their personal agendas.

The new president and his government have the opportunity to sow trust with clear, explicit and urgent decisions in a short period of one and a half years; that although they cannot solve all problems, they must at least lay the foundations for the development and recovery of trust.

What trust can there be in one of the pillars of democracy, the administration of justice, when the procedure for selecting national judges is carried out today, which is flawed, highly discredited and which is not important to those who manage the administrative body and the disciplinary judiciary. They continue to mock the country with mistake after mistake. There is no legality, legitimacy, constitutionality. On the contrary, clear shortcomings were pointed out that are repeated and should force, at the very least, the suspension of the tender, which is not for the vanity of the authorities, especially when they are discredited and even prosecuted for obstruction of justice. , influence peddling and money laundering. It is assumed that everything is being done to please those who constantly press for impunity, instead of guaranteeing the transparency and independence of the judiciary.

Criticism went beyond internal frameworks when observers at the highest level of the UN seriously questioned this process of selecting judges and suggested that it be immediately corrected and reconsidered because it does not inspire any confidence. They questioned several stages of the competition, including the repetition of confidence tests, the lack of clarity and justification of results in the merit stage. They emphasized the importance of guaranteeing judicial independence and transparency in processes related to selection, evaluation and sanctioning.

They suggested the need to return to the competition in order to solve the mentioned difficulties and observe the consequences that the brought process could have and the possible illegitimacy of those who were appointed as new judges of the National Court of Justice. National and departmental authorities, politicians, members of parliament, judges should show by their actions, apart from demagoguery, contradictions and lies, that they are there to respect the law. The assembly must create trust and not delay the inauguration of the new state controller who was chosen in a competition that closed three weeks ago. All because the candidate they wanted did not emerge. (OR)