Miguel Rivadeneira Vallejo

The state, institutions and good and honest people must close ranks before the invasion of organized crime, in coexistence with political actors. Show that they disagree and defend the established order. Sectors have been identified that besiege the institutions and act contrary to the tasks that the chief state attorney fulfills with courage and determination and intends to continue her wild career in favor of impunity.

Three active sectors have been identified: criminals and sexual abusers, who have executed judgments with the action of more than a dozen judges at the highest level, who are responsible for judgments; lawyers and other defenders of criminals acting in this sense; and blind people who spread lies and nonsense and blindly repeat what populist politicians and demagogues mislead them, without coming to their senses, thinking, or even enlightening and informing themselves.

With the contribution of certain communicators and media that denigrate ethics, who openly served the government and various governments in power, without moral quality, under the auspices of already discredited universities. In contrast, the famous Central University, whose University Council unanimously (39 out of 39 members) rejected the lawsuit of a group of lawyers interested in the cause of impunity and thus tried to weaken the professional work and prosecution of the corrupt. evidence or support with the aim of deceiving the country.

The main goal is to play the game of impunity, to prevent further investigations of serious acts of corruption in the exercise of power, to aim for the revision of executed judgments after they were not able to show exculpatory evidence in the prescribed procedure and for They are working on institutional destabilization with tricks and delusions.

The main goal is to play the game of impunity, to prevent further investigations of serious corruption acts.

This concerted action was articulated with the organizations that were questioned and undertaken by the defenders of the convicted. This is the case of CPCCS, which only served to take over oversight agencies with disgraceful appointments such as the 100 out of 100 comptroller who earned a concussion conviction here, escaped and is now being prosecuted for money laundering in the US. It assumes functions that are not within its competence, in contrast to the failure to fulfill constitutional tasks (Art. 208), such as the fight against corruption and the long-term delay in appointing supervisory bodies.

Similarly, the Judicial Council, an administrative and disciplinary body which has been discredited by the actions of the majority of its members, which today does not fulfill its tasks and has become complacent with corrupt judges who act against the law and favor measures of constitutional indictment of those convicted of corruption and leaders of criminal groups. Others who ordered the reinstatement of hundreds of uniformed officers who had been disqualified and accused of corruption, and even some who confessed their wrongdoings and were convicted, but later appealed and were dealt with by judges. (OR)