It is sad to see how impunity and forgiveness are imposed on those responsible for corrupt acts who have been legally convicted, with the disinterest of most sectors and uninformed citizens who, disappointed in the politicians, have little interest in the present and the future of the country.

There is evidence of the poor work of individual judges at different levels, accused of malfeasance. Some with judgments that were contrary to the express law, recognized by the judicial authorities, but protected, by action or omission, by those who should exercise administrative and disciplinary control in the respective CNJ, unlike other judges whom they prosecute for corruption and that they were suspended.

That there was no evidence of fraud and economic damage, arguments that will enter the discussion in the appeal phase of the Dhruv helicopters case

Judges who restore political rights to those convicted of accepting bribes, which is contrary to the constitutional norm. They attend constitutional actions irregularly. Another judge dismisses those connected with the irregular purchase of 7 Druhv helicopters, of which 4 crashed and 3 died. For the remaining 3 devices, operation is prohibited due to risk.

In the verdict, the cancellation is justified by the fact that there was no economic damage because the insurance returned more than the investment. It was during the return that the insurance company recognized irregularities and defects. This poor acquisition was noticed by the former commander of the FAE, General Jorge Gabela, who was threatened and killed. It turned out that in this trial it was all a story, only the economic issue was evaluated, not the loss of human life or the plane crash or the poor procurement of a helicopter in a terrible condition.

Patricia Ochoa: The judge didn’t take the time to review what the plaintiff submitted, it’s not just the $45 million, it’s that what they got was not up to the level of what was requested

This is another example of institutions not functioning fully. Justice with corrupt judges, not all of them, who occasionally trample on the Constitution, codes and laws, in favor of already convicted criminals, amidst the leniency, slowness and complicity of the administrative and disciplinary body, with 3 of its 5 members investigated and criminally prosecuted for alleged serious irregularities and with evidence on interference in judicial affairs. A delegate of the judiciary who should embarrass that function of the state. Instead of acting zealously against judges who denigrate justice, they tried to suspend the prosecutor without having the authority to do so. Then they suspended the judge, erratically, who wanted to announce the sentence for corruption in another case and wanted to prosecute two of her members for alleged irregularities. That is obstruction of justice. On the other hand, they do not act urgently in front of a judge who is on the run, and who restored the political rights of a man convicted of corruption and who before that made controversial verdicts. They do not even intervene because of the actions of the judge who dismissed the Druhv case, who previously declared the process null and void due to alleged irregularities in the Singue field case. These facts explain why they claim that there is little left to achieve complete impunity in other cases of corruption, before the eyes and with the patience of the country. (OR)