The inspector of the Local Police of Murcia who urged the singer to dress Rocio Saiz for showing her breasts during her performance, she did not open a file for exhibitionism, but for disorderly order based on the citizen security law.

In the three pages of the report, to which laSexta has had access, the inspector argues that he initiated the proceedings for the commission of an exhibitionism offence, alluding to the article 185 Penal Codealthough he acknowledges that “the events have been carried out within a show whose purpose it was not to satisfy sexual impulses of the accused“, requirement of this crime.

He also attributes disobedience to him by not wanting to accompany him to the police station and says that “the accused was apparently under the influence of alcoholic beveragesas well as from the perspective of the subscriber of some kind of toxic drug“.

“The artist, at a given moment in her performance, has taken off her shirt, leaving the upper part of her body completely without clothes,” he explains. At that time, Saiz was asked to cover, “because, without having been able to identify any minor, it has been observed that there were several in the areawithout prejudice to those who could be found in the surrounding area, since there were quite a few families”.

“That limit could not be crossed”

The agent talks about the “own idiosyncrasy” that the celebration had on the occasion of LGTBI Pride, but adds: “That limit could not be crossed“. That is, despite the fact that there were no minors, the “limit” that the agent speaks of was enough to stop the performance of Rocío Saiz.

According to the report, Saiz said phrases such as “The police want to arrest me”, “this is what you have voted for”, “I am going to leave the music”, “you have to go against them”, “this is what they want” or ” We have to go against them.” Later, it is reported that the artist took off her shirt again “disobeying the mandate of the agents of authority.”

After “assessing the situation”, the agent decided “not to appear” given that the facts recorded, “although could have a criminal nature“based on article 185 of the Penal Code, minors were not identified“without prejudice to the fact that the facts have certainly been carried out within a show whose purpose was not to satisfy the sexual impulses of the accused.”