Gloria Group addresses a controversy in Colombia After receiving a sanction of US $ 2.2 million. According to the information provided by local authorities, the Peruvian conglomerate, together with other producers in the sector, would have incurred the use of additives in the elaboration of dairy products.
This action is considered a prohibited practice in Colombia, because this byproduct lacks the same nutritional value as milk. The fine He has intensified the tensions between the company and the regulatory entities, while Gloria does not accept the accusations and has decided to take legal actions to defend her position.
What forbidden input used Gloria Grupo in the manufacture of milk products in Colombia?
The Gloria Group received a fine of US $ 2.2 million imposed by the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce (SIC) of Colombia. According to the information issued by the regulatory body, the conglomerate and four other producers would have used Lactosuero As an additive in the production of whole hygienized milk (UAT), a prohibited practice in the country because this by -product does not have the same nutritional value as milk.
The Superintendence of Industry and Commerce He revealed that the other companies are Lactalis, Hacienda San Mateo and Sabanalac. These have been marketing products labeled as whole milk, although they actually contained lactosuero. This byproduct retains about 55% of milk components, such as lactose, but does not offer the same nutritional benefits as the original dairy product.
What was the response of the Gloria Group following the regulatory measure in Colombia?
The Gloria Group reacted to the sanction imposed by the SIC through a statement in which the accusations categorically dismissed. The company said it did not receive official notification of the regulatory entity and that it was aware of the resolution through the press. In the same pronouncement, he described the ruling as “unfounded”And he announced his intention to initiate legal actions to appeal the decision in the relevant instances.
Likewise, the Glory Group said that its rights have been violated, since it refers to the SIC retroactively applying a regulation that began to govern in January 2024. According to the company, the samples used in the investigation were collected four years before of the entry into force of the law, which, according to its perspective, represents a transgression to due process. In a statement, it was assured that “the company will act fully complying with the Colombian regulation and will appeal said decision in the corresponding instances.”
Grupo Gloria expanded in Ecuador
The Peruvian conglomerate announced in January the acquisition of 100% of Ecuajugos, a subsidiary of Nestlé In Ecuador, which marks a significant step in its regional growth strategy. The Superintendence of the Securities Market (SMV) has reported that the merger between Ecuages and a Peruvian conglomerate was carried out after receiving the approval of the Superintendence of Economic Competition of Ecuador. This regulatory entity was responsible for verifying that the conditions of the agreement were adequate, so it ensures equitable competition in the market.
Source: Larepublica
Alia is a professional author and journalist, working at 247 news agency. She writes on various topics from economy news to general interest pieces, providing readers with relevant and informative content. With years of experience, she brings a unique perspective and in-depth analysis to her work.
