Michał Cie¶lak’s co-promoter comments on his fight. “Big unsatisfactory. Anti-promotion of boxing”

The fight took place on Sunday evening. “I have to demolish my opponent in every possible situation,” he said before the fight in London. Its course, however, was completely different. The Englishman’s aggression was felt in the first two rounds. He hit Cieślak several times, but he was standing calmly on his feet. Only in the third round did the Pole go on the offensive. “He should impose more pressure, Michał is dangerous when he is an aggressor, he moves forward” – commented Grzegorz Proksa hotly.

The following rounds were full of struggles and clinches. What the fans expected, and not only that, as it turns out also Cieślak’s co-promoter. .

Michał Cieślak could not cope with the master. “Laughter through tears. We were afraid that the judge would let the wedges”

– This is laughter through tears. If Michał lost after a pure boxing fight, this is the sport. We were afraid of the fight that the referee would allow clinches, we wrote letters about it, we talked, while Michael Alexander, being an old bastard who knew all about, simply did not see what he did not want to see and allowed a fight that would evidently it suited Okol better – he said after the fight, quoted by.

For more sports content, visit

The co-promoter admitted that he felt sorry for his ward. – He was physically fantastically prepared, the coaches did a great job, and the fans actually got “crap”. 12 rounds of pushing, grabbing, knots. Big hunger, he said.

And he added: – It was anti-promotion of boxing. I want to see this discipline as a certain art of footwork, certain technical elements, and it was not here, because it was mainly a clinch. Looking for positives, Michał had a good 12 rounds, he showed himself as a tough competitor with character. He was on the boards, but he got up, attacked, tried to fight until the last second – finished Wasilewski.