news agency

‘Valbuena speaks from rancor; in front of him he has Karim Benzema who flies over current football ‘

Regarding the absence of Benzema in the trial, the soccer player’s defense pointed out that the Frenchman’s sports obligations were going to make it impossible.

The attorney for Karim Benzema in the blackmail case against Mathieu ValbuenaSylvain Cormier, considered that the victim “acts with envy” by accusing his client of complicity in the case, while justifying the Madridista’s absence in the oral hearing for his sports commitments.

Valbuena speaks from resentment, he thinks that he was discarded, he could not return to the national team, he has declined sportingly and in front of him he has Karim Benzema who flies over current football. There is a form of envy, “said the lawyer at the end of the first day of the process, held this Wednesday.

In it, Valbuena persisted in considering that Benzema’s intervention in the case was malicious, contrary to what was declared in all previous interrogations by the Real Madrid player, who indicated that he only wanted to help his then teammate in the national team French national.

Cormier affirmed that the accusation against his client rests on the interpretation of a telephone conversation intervened by the police with his friend Karim Zenati, an ex-convict whom he asked to intervene to help Valbuena.

“They have made this process a mountain that rests on pieces of conversations taken out of context,” he said.

In addition to that, he pointed out, the charges against Benzema rest on the sentiment that Valbuena kept from the conversation that both players had on October 6, 2015 during a concentration of the national team.

In it, Benzema proposed to Valbuena the help of Zenati to solve the blackmail with a sexual video to which he was being subjected, but Valbuena understood it as pressure to pay.

“In this case, after six years of instruction nothing has changed, I think there is a great error of instruction,” said the lawyer.

Regarding Benzema’s absence from the trial, Cormier pointed out that last night’s Champions League match in Kiev and the proximity of Sunday’s classic against Barcelona made it impossible.

“The alternative was to ask for a postponement and that delayed us at least a year,” he said.

He rejected accusations by Valbuena’s lawyers that his client is afraid of a face-to-face with the former Olympique de Marseille player.

“This was not a confrontation. We asked for a confrontation up to four times and they did not support us, ”he said. (D)

You may also like

Hot News

TRENDING NEWS

Subscribe

follow us

Immediate Access Pro