A show that claimed everything Uruguay as it could have meant 2-2 for La Celeste vs Ecuador and on the last ball of the match he has his verdict of Conmebol.
The chancellor of South American football expanded the Brazilian referee’s dialogue Wilton Sampaio with his VAR associates (Daniel Nobre) and AVAR (Igor Benevenuto) in a controversial action that took place in minutes 90+7 meeting held in Quito, for the date of 2 qualifying matches for the 2026 FIFA World Cup in the United States, Mexico and Canada.
After Federico Valverde’s cross and header from Facundo Torreswhich caused a great save Hernán Galindez, a clash took place between the tricolor goalkeeper and the Uruguayan striker. The game was not only continued, but a foul was awarded in favor of Ecuador. Facundo Pellistri about the Ecuadorian striker Kevin Rodriguez.
Clarification of Conmebol and description of situations in the game, based on the VAR protocol and the Rules of the Game
In the 97th minute, in an argument in the penalty area of the yellow team, the goalkeeper in pink jumps to deflect the ball, scoring his own goal, and immediately as a result of the said argument, a normal game contact with the white attacker is generated, without configuring any violation. Later, in another scrimmage, yellow clears the ball and the attacker in white commits a foul. The referee continues to see the game, and in the first action he allows the game to continue, and in the second he awards a direct free kick in favor of the defending team. The VAR, in its protocol check, using different angles, speeds and exact considerations, confirms the original decision on the field: no foul, no penalty in the first action; and a direct free kick in favor of the defending team in the second.”
Transcription of Wilton Sampaio’s dialogue with VAR and AVAR and listen to the full audio
VAR: Possible offside, possible penalty
AVAR: Offense marked on the field
VAR: Give me a mini camera
VAR: Follow the decision on the field. Give me the mini camera
AVAR: Foul awarded
VAR: Mini camera. go back there
VAR: Saved after falling. Back to tactics, English style
VAR: In that English, there. You can go back, go back to the first contact
VAR: The goalkeeper defends the ball and then hits him in the face with his hands. Let’s continue.
VAR: I just need an identity, give me an inversion. Identity of the player who will shoot
VAR: The goalkeeper defends, so he accidentally hits him with his hand
VAR: Ok, for me it’s completely accidental. Diagonal…
VAR: The goalkeeper defends and then hits the defense with his hand
AVAR: He doesn’t see, he defends himself and collapses
VAR: And they fouled him after that, perfect
VAR: Perfect, I don’t see a foul, the goalkeeper saves with his chest and then accidentally stays there
VAR: Wilton, can you hear me right?
Judge: Okay, okay, tell me
VAR: It was checked. The goalkeeper’s ball, the goalkeeper defends the ball and with that movement collides with the face of the attacking player who accidentally hit his head. Totally random.
South American qualifiers 2026
Source: Eluniverso

Tristin is an accomplished author and journalist, known for his in-depth and engaging writing on sports. He currently works as a writer at 247 News Agency, where he has established himself as a respected voice in the sports industry.