In new generations, but not only on them, and without being something completely new, polyamory begins to gain space, so much so that there is a need for theoretical justifications along with the need to outline ethical guidelines focused on moral argument.

Polyamory is an option for maintaining multiple couples, with whom there are no casual encounters, but rather tends to maintain multiple romantic relationships at the same time. Unlike a single person who may have multiple sexual partners or a person in a monogamous relationship who chooses to be unfaithful, a polyamorous person tends to maintain love with several of them.

Dear homeland!

In the framework of common and theoretical arguments, it is repeated again and again that monogamy is an invention of the system, a device of power, Foucault would say, which works hand in hand with patriarchy and capitalism to subjugate the desires and bodies of the subject. Thus, love has become the least visible of the various fields of struggle of today’s progressivism, and it is another dimension in which it strives to free the individual from the worldly evils that man himself has created.

What do you suggest? Polyamory, from a weak understanding of rationality, considers that it is possible to reach a consensus among those involved in love in order to agree on the number of different couples that can be maintained, what kind of sexual relations to have, what days and the number of hours It is possible to allocate to different couples , and thus countless agreements aimed at controlling love. Can you imagine that Anna Karenina sat her husband Karenina and her lover Vronsky at the same table and in one afternoon reached a consensus and made a calendar and rules for their love relationship? Tolstoy would be left without one of his great novels.

Can a woman be the Messiah?

A polyamorous person believes that there is no point in feeling bad or guilty about falling in love or having sex with people who are not their partner. Why should you feel bad if pleasure is good? Polyamory seeks to eliminate those feelings and experiences of love that make us feel bad, seeks to perfect love by removing its boundaries to replace them with an illusory human rationality that seeks to control and/or eliminate jealousy, insecurity, commitment and duty in the face of love.other. Love is perhaps one of the most complex emotions in the human experience. It is undoubtedly a merry-go-round, and it was not for nothing that several philosophers described it as a feeling of vertigo from being launched into the void. There is not only pleasure, happiness, satisfaction, it includes fear, frustration, anxiety, pain, sadness. But above all, it is an ongoing decision to maintain commitment to the other through continuous learning, born not from an anticipatory session, but from a continuous exercise of trial and error. Which is not only satisfying, but also disturbing and boring. A polyamorous person only wants pleasure and well-being, and to control one of our most complex emotions. Love beneath design and planning is not love; Without spontaneity there is no freedom, and love should be a decision of freedom. Polyamory? No Thanks. (OR)