The term “per se” means “by itself, by its nature”.

Will there always be victims? I don’t believe in fatalism that will be lifelong, even when it becomes difficult for them to change their actions. But it is serious if frauds or omissions are allowed to pass, worse if cheaters are rewarded for their vivacity or daring, which sets disastrous precedents.

“If others were allowed, why not me?” it might be the phrase of one who supposes that he is not favored, when others who have done or are doing similar things have been permitted.

Let’s look at the case of former US President Donald Trump. He is morbidly prosecuted. To this day, he is accused of assaulting the woman he agreed to and then abandoned; for making false statements about the value of one’s property, changing appraisals in order to obtain a loan; for falsely declaring the financing of his election campaign in 2016, which enabled him to become president of his country in January 2017; for taking and reproducing sensitive United States security data while he was president; and for being the leader of a conspiracy to try to prevent, through the actions of organized crime, the succession of the President in January 2021. Will North American courts convict him in any of the above processes?

In Ecuador, among actors of state power, among candidates, among those who must be tax payers, false statements, evasions and evasions are repeated, which does not mean that everyone formulates or practices them.

…it is serious if frauds or omissions are missed, worse if cheaters are rewarded for their vivacity or daring.

Do the control entities established by the Constitution work? There are control processes in the Office of the Supervisor and in the supervisors, but the demand for possibilities and forms of prevention must be strengthened, which must not be nor can be perceived as an obstacle for the subjects of supervision. It is not good that its management is experienced only when there are already completed and perhaps irreversible facts. We will have to hope that the process of appointing its holders is not contaminated by political bias. The Council for Citizen Participation and Social Control (CCCCS), popularly elected, was used to attempt persecution or protection.

And to the already intricate entanglement – intricate and intertwined circumstances and actions – of the function of the state is added the abuse of those who, referring to the quality of constitutional judges, dedicate themselves to beating administrative boards with protective actions.

In private business, there are those who prefer to respect all regulations, which sometimes seem absurd, because they are purely formal, but there are also actors who avoid and avoid corporate, commercial, administrative and tax obligations. For example, in terms of capitalization, there is an effort to increase capitalization levels through effective contributions, but due to the bogus scheme of simulating credit accounts to cross them with capital accounts, there are gaps. The subject of control must sanction those who did it, because even when the amounts are fraudulent, a precedent must be set. (OR)