The term title means doing what you want regardless of when, how, where or whether the decision or action or behavior was or is right.

It is not okay to be on your best behavior at home, at work, in the corporation, or in business. Wherever possible, for what can be transcendent, there must be an awareness of why, even more so if they could be affected.

It might be for an anthology of absurdity what I knew about a license for an important job, where a license means both the brain and the nervous system, and if lost it might not be easy to find a similar one. The contract proposal has more than twenty pages, with attachments, and everything can be pure straw when it is proposed to insert a clause according to which the supplier can terminate the contract “of his own accord” without giving a reason, only with a notice period of thirty calendar days. free will and discretion.” Faced with the absurdity of the proposal, wanting to understand why it was formulated, the answer could be “a lot happens”. Is it convenient for every domestic counterpart, of course it is, to get a good salary, not caring about other circumstances such as stability I am sure that in this and other cases, contractual corrective measures will be proposed, because it is not about intimidating investments, but about mutual respect, both for workers and real competitiveness.

And that very seriously in decisions and public administration.

In previous columns, I told that members of the assembly debated and voted for hours in the Montecristi Constituent Assembly (2007-2008). When written texts appeared that were not always what was discussed and voted on, the answer was “that’s the text they want in Quito” – it should have been in the environment of President Rafael Correa. And so it was until the final text of July 24, 2008. That’s why I didn’t vote either for or against that supposed constitutional text, I preferred to abstain from voting, stating why.

Wherever possible, for what can be transcendent, there must be an awareness of why, even more so if they could be affected.

Telematic voting (for the vote from abroad in the elections on August 20) is a disgrace with biases that should force the immediate intervention of the controller and the prosecutor’s office. The service was delivered to a foreign limited liability company, Antroporyectos SC, not subject to corporate control in Ecuador, which did environmental consulting, without evidence of any experience in systems, the only “bidder”, who advocates confidential information so as not to give an explanation. His representative notes that he has seven years of international consulting experience, but did not specify which consultants.

The company points out: “All attacks on the system were reported to the staff in charge of information security (…) it was such a well-planned and progressive attack targeting the system.” Maybe because the recruitment was programmed.

And it is a gift to repeat the elections of representatives abroad and our own from abroad, to influence some political forces, taking away their mandates, thereby favoring others. (OR)