On May 14, the prefect of Guayas and the mayor of Guayaquil began their duties. If the people elected them with a significant difference in votes, with a simple campaign, well designed in relation to the people’s interests, without insults, without the influence of that prosecution for the sale of Samana land, we must support them in their work.

Letter to Achilles

From the time of the engineer Febres-Corder and the mayorship of the lawyer Jaime Nebot, the majority of Guayaquileños always voted for them or List 6 or Madera de Guerrero, which sponsored their candidacies, because they obeyed the Guayaquileños and were an example for the other cantons of Guayas. During their administrations we had peace and tranquility in our activities, no one was persecuted for their ideas, the services of the city that no longer existed were very well organized, public money was managed correctly according to the Comptroller’s Office and we got rid of the authoritarianism of the correistas who wanted Download Guayaquil. I can say that Guayaquil was a successful model of development, of course, if every year we have the immigration of 50,000 citizens from other provinces, who flee the provinces because of the wrong agrarian policy or the abandonment of agriculture or the government’s quemeimportism that puts a bucolic poet like the Minister of Agriculture, with the abolition of visas for entry into the country, and thousands of foreigners are arriving, which the city had to take over, and the government that irresponsibly dictated these laws should have been responsible. With these amounts of people, there are no economic, social, educational or health resources to access, land invasions are overwhelming and the crisis of many government services is happening without any municipal accountability.

new city

For the sake of Guayaquil, it would be good if the elected dignitaries had administrative and party freedom…

“The temporary appointments that were made a month ago attract our attention”: Marcela Aguiñaga began a tour of the Prefecture’s sheds

The loss of these social-Christian bastions was to be expected. We voted for an intelligent, serious professional woman, and when she became mayor she completely changed, she lost her bearings on what it means to be the mayor of Guayaquil, and she was one of the best figures in the party. The indignation of many citizens who saw that the leader who kept us free and strong against correísmo now appears as an ally of the one who represents the rottenness of the political system that Guayaquil did not share, and that the mayor together with the people of Guayaquil had him at the borders throughout his administration. A person who hated Guayaquil and who never gave the Municipality additional funds for the necessary works. We hope that our former mayor, for whom there is respect and gratitude, can use his intelligence to analyze serious political problems without justified resentment and take a position that leads us on the right path.

For the sake of Guayaquil, it would be good if elected dignitaries have administrative and party freedom, so that there is no political pressure or forcing Guayaquil to participate in criminal or destabilizing demonstrations, especially since the former president and his aides are not good examples of governance or taking care of public money . (OR)