The scandal after the final episode of the new Netflix series. “Disgusting.” The idea was to capture the actor’s “charms”.

On May 2, 2024, the 6-episode “Guy with Principles” was added to the library, the script of which was based on the best-selling novel of the same title by Tom Wolfe. The expectations were huge, especially since the beloved Jeff Daniels played the main role, and alongside him appeared Diane Lane, Aml Ameen, Sarah Jones and Jerrika Hinton. However, the first reviews are divided, and viewers do not hide their disappointment with the multitude of intimate plots.

That’s what “A Guy With Principles” is about. Viewers were outraged by the final episode of the series

The plot of the series “Guy with Principles” focuses on the fate of Charlie Croker, who is a real estate tycoon in Atlanta. At some point, his successful business begins to fail and he has to face bankruptcy. Trying to save the company from complete failure and at the same time having it taken over by people who want to get rich from his difficult situation, he becomes a participant in several serious conflicts. Not only business but also politics is at stake.

Although it was assumed that “A Guy with Principles” would be a hit, the opinions of both viewers and critics are not optimistic. All thanks to the last episode, specifically with Tom Pelphrey, who created the character of Raymond Peepgrass. The screen shows the actor’s penis in feint right after taking the potency substance. Even though there was a warning before the broadcast about scenes intended only for adult viewers, the shot caused huge controversy and received wide coverage in the media.

Reviewers criticize Netflix for promoting nudity. “A guy with principles” already has such opinions

American audiences say it’s “breaking the last TV taboo.” The British also have a similar opinion, calling the series finale a “cheap production for adults”. However, other reviewers do not mince their words, claiming that this is a clear violation of any moral principles.

I don’t want to watch graphic close-up scenes while watching a drama. There are already too many of them and they reduce us to the level of animals

– columnist Mary Killen in the weekly “Spectator”. Radio journalist Anne Atkins also commented on the matter, saying that she clearly forgets about any boundaries. – This is not only repulsive to many normal viewers, but from an artistic point of view completely unnecessary – she said, suggesting that this plot could have been played in a dozen different ways, without the need to present the actor’s “charms” to the camera. Many also point out that children also have access to this production, as the website does not control the age of users. If you feel like it, vote in our poll below.