“Rebel Moon – Part 2: Inflicting Wounds” is the second installment of the story about an agricultural planet, space farmers and an evil empire opposed by rebels. The script was created based on a story by Zack Snyder, who was also responsible for directing. The production in the first draft created by Snyder could have become part of the “Star Wars” universe. In 2012, the director showed “a space story inspired by Kurosawa” at LucasFilm. LucasFilm chose “The Force Awakens”, but Snyder didn’t throw the idea away. Malicious people will say that unfortunately.
Zack Snyder created a series about space farmers for Netflix. He claims to have defeated “Barbie”
Snyder ultimately modified the details in his idea, removing, among other things, Jedi Knights, and decided to show it to Netflix. I liked the idea. The first and second installments cost a total of $166 million, but “Rebel Moon” was not as successful as the director dreamed of. “Rebel Moon – Part 2: Inflicting Wounds” had 21.4 million viewers on its opening day. For comparison, the first part had 23.9 million viewers on the day of its premiere on Netflix. On December 25, the number reached 34 million. In total, it is estimated that both were viewed approximately 90 million times. – 90 million views equals 90 million accounts. Let’s estimate that’s two viewers in front of the screen, right? That means 160 million viewers. At $10 per ticket, that’s $1.6 billion – Snyder on “The Joe Rogan Experience” podcast. “Barbie” earned $1.4 billion at the box office. The director is already planning further parts and the development of the universe.
Critics and viewers left no stone unturned in “Rebel Moon”. “What a load of nonsense”
However, critics leave no stone unturned in the production. On the website where audiences and critics “hand” fresh or rotten tomatoes to productions, Zack Snyder’s latest blockbuster received only 15 percent. positive reviews from critics and 52 percent from viewers. Fans rated it 4.5 stars out of 10. On the website, viewers were a bit more kind, where it received 5.2 out of 10.
What a bunch of bullshit.
This movie makes no sense.
– fans from IMDb.com pointed out. Critical opinions prevailed, but some pointed out that if someone didn’t like the first part, why bother with the second part? Critics, in turn, claim that it is a definitely worse and more boring version of Kurosawa’s “Seven Samurai”, or even “the worst blockbuster” of this year, if not in history. David Fear from Rolling Stone magazine advised “take your eyes off the screens and go for a walk.” Radosław Czyż bluntly stated that “it is a cosmic nightmare.”
After watching the spectacle of “Rebel Moon Part 2: Inflicting Wounds”, I regret that Kurosawa made “Seven Samurai”. I love this movie, but if it hadn’t been made, I wouldn’t have had to watch Zack Snyder’s shoddy remake.
Source: Gazeta
Bruce is a talented author and journalist with a passion for entertainment . He currently works as a writer at the 247 News Agency, where he has established himself as a respected voice in the industry.
