Karol Strasburger reveals who the “surveyees” in “Familiada” are

Karol Strasburger reveals who the “surveyees” in “Familiada” are

Karol Strasburger revealed the TV kitchen behind “Familiada”. Do legendary respondents, whom no one has ever seen in person, exist?

he was a guest on Channel Zero. In a long conversation, he revealed what the background of one of the cult programs of Polish Television – “” looks like. The show celebrates its 30th anniversary this year and has been relying on them all this time – the interviewees.

“Familiada”. Karol Strasburger reveals who the “surveyees” are

The “Familiada” format came to us from the United States. From the very beginning, it is based on the fight between two teams trying to guess the answers given by anonymous respondents. Each episode covers several categories, and almost 3,000 episodes have been broadcast so far. In total, this gives a considerable number of questions and dozens of answers provided by respondents – respondents whom, according to local information, no one saw or heard. Rumors unfriendly to the program say that these people do not exist at all, and the answers to the questions (sometimes extremely absurd) are invented by people working on “Familiada”. In recent years, there have also been suspicions that the “surveyors” are actually artificial intelligence that generates random answers to subsequent questions.

Karol Strasburger reassures us – none of these theories are true. The interviewers are real people, flesh and blood, who volunteer for this task. What’s more, they are divided into two groups, as he talked about in more detail in Channel Zero:

This is such a mysterious topic. Among the interviewers are those who volunteer and their families. Our people go to the field and collect people who have volunteered. Surveys are carried out among them – the family reports, receives questions and answers. This is one group. The second group is a very broad online group and they receive questions via the Internet.

Has the host of the program ever participated in the process of questioning respondents? This is not primarily a matter of responsibilities, but, as it turns out, also of interests:

I’m not interested at all. I’m not here for that. I try not to make assumptions about things that don’t concern me. I provide knowledge that is regulatory knowledge. I know it’s happening. I get people, questions and surveys. That’s all I get. I don’t get into any “where did these people come from, and why are they like this and not different” questions. That would be too much. It would be unfair for me to go into some private matter of something that is outside the studio. This doesn `t concern me. I have a program to run, I have people and that’s it.

Before recording, you can review the list of the most important answers to specific questions. However, once the cameras are rolling, Strasburger relies on his own memory and reaction speed:

I more or less know what the highest scoring answers are. But I don’t have it while playing. Some things surprise me, he confessed.

Source: Gazeta

You may also like

Immediate Access Pro