According to the AFPs, there are ten technical entities —both national and international— that reject a new withdrawal of pension funds, and agree with the president of the Congressional Economic Commission, Rosangella Barbarán, on the solution: prioritize the reform of the system, since the release of savings affects those who have already spent everything.
It is worth noting that There are eight bills that establish a seventh withdrawal of the AFPs. However, there are global entities, such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank and the International Federation of Pension Fund Administrators (FIAP). , who do not endorse this measure.
Because? According to statements by Pablo Antolín, chief economist of the Private Pensions Unit of the OECD’s Financial Affairs Division, “the best way to help those who have lost purchasing power and their jobs is through the State budget and not with pension savings”. He added that “it does not help in its adhesion to the OECD” that these retirement policies are normalized.
At the local level, the institutions that support the AFPs in this matter are the Central Reserve Bank of Peru (BCRP), the Superintendency of Banking, Insurance and AFPs (SBS), the Ombudsman’s Office and the Ministries of Economy and Labor.
For example, from the BCRP, warns of impacts on inflationary indices, that is, the rise in prices and would make us “one of the countries with the greatest future vulnerability in terms of pensions.”
Source: Larepublica
Alia is a professional author and journalist, working at 247 news agency. She writes on various topics from economy news to general interest pieces, providing readers with relevant and informative content. With years of experience, she brings a unique perspective and in-depth analysis to her work.
